Randy has the night off. Eddie begins with a discussion of the U.S. Constitution’s 4.1 clause pertaining to the “full faith and credit” that each State shall afford to each of the other States’ laws, the transference of inalienable rights across (American) State lines, a Department of Justice official’s court brief acknowledging that the activity of engaging in commerce is “integral” to drivers licenses, and Jeffersons “Nature and Nature’s God” (per Declaration of Independence).
“The right to travel is part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v Dulles, 357 US 116 at 125.
Eddie quotes many other court cases explicitly acknowledging the right to travel without the permission of the State.
Chad (TX) tells [at 0hr 34m] of his meeting with a prosecutor who falsely told him that he did not have the right to evidentiary due process in a Justice of the Peace court case. Eddie encourages bar grievances for every falsehood. She also filed sanction charges against him, even though he does not practice law.
Kevin (CO) [at 0hr40m] is trying to get to the grand jury after being brutally assaulted from behind by the State Patrol at a traffic stop, where he got a concussion, while trying to make a 911 call (which is a felony). They did not care for his mention of their video camera. Because of his injuries, he was taken to a hospital. These officers followed him there, into his room, and abused him there. The judge subsequently denied Kevin the discovery of evidence. He has multiple medical problems now and is having great difficulty functioning at his job. Deborah strongly encourages Kevin to sue the hospital, its doctors, and its nurses, invoking Randy’s Tar Baby strategy. Because Kevin is classified as half-disabled, she encourages suing under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Kevin has numerous causes of action.
Frank (NY) revisits [at 1hr13m] his ROL conversation from August 26 about the traffic stop where his car was taken from him by the police while he was on private property. A Eddie and Deborah explain the differences between a civil case and a criminal complaint. Frank has numerous causes of action.
Alan (TX) also revisits [at 1hr33m40s] his brief ROL conversation from August 26 about a false charge of forging a financial instrument and being punched in the face. Even though he was apprehended with a warrant (to be taken to a magistrate), he was taken immediately to jail first. Without his presence the judge set his bail (in an ex parte hearing). Alan went to the courthouse to see his court file and there was none. Deborah explains the probability that the prosecutor has absconded with it, which is a felony. Alan has numerous causes of action.
Brain (MN) also revisits [at 1hr52m] his brief ROL conversation from August 26 concerning his speeding traffic stop that turned into a search and seizure of his vehicle. The police falsified evidence. Eddie throws out possibilities: criminal conspiracy, denial of due process, aggravated assault, and aggravated kidnapping. It is suggested that Brian file criminal complaints, that he file a motion withdrawing his “conciliation court” papers so that he can proceed into a formal court proceeding, and that he file criminal complaints with the grand jury.
Randy has the night off. Eddie begins with a discussion of the U.S. Constitution’s 4.1 clause pertaining to the “full faith and credit” that each State shall afford to each of the other States’ laws, the transference of inalienable rights across (American) State lines, a Department of Justice official’s court brief acknowledging that the activity of engaging in commerce is “integral” to drivers licenses, and Jeffersons “Nature and Nature’s God” (per Declaration of Independence).
“The right to travel is part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v Dulles, 357 US 116 at 125.
Eddie quotes many other court cases explicitly acknowledging the right to travel without the permission of the State.
Chad (TX) tells [at 0hr 34m] of his meeting with a prosecutor who falsely told him that he did not have the right to evidentiary due process in a Justice of the Peace court case. Eddie encourages bar grievances for every falsehood. She also filed sanction charges against him, even though he does not practice law.
Kevin (CO) [at 0hr40m] is trying to get to the grand jury after being brutally assaulted from behind by the State Patrol at a traffic stop, where he got a concussion, while trying to make a 911 call (which is a felony). They did not care for his mention of their video camera. Because of his injuries, he was taken to a hospital. These officers followed him there, into his room, and abused him there. The judge subsequently denied Kevin the discovery of evidence. He has multiple medical problems now and is having great difficulty functioning at his job. Deborah strongly encourages Kevin to sue the hospital, its doctors, and its nurses, invoking Randy’s Tar Baby strategy. Because Kevin is classified as half-disabled, she encourages suing under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Kevin has numerous causes of action.
Frank (NY) revisits [at 1hr13m] his ROL conversation from August 26 about the traffic stop where his car was taken from him by the police while he was on private property. A Eddie and Deborah explain the differences between a civil case and a criminal complaint. Frank has numerous causes of action.
Alan (TX) also revisits [at 1hr33m40s] his brief ROL conversation from August 26 about a false charge of forging a financial instrument and being punched in the face. Even though he was apprehended with a warrant (to be taken to a magistrate), he was taken immediately to jail first. Without his presence the judge set his bail (in an ex parte hearing). Alan went to the courthouse to see his court file and there was none. Deborah explains the probability that the prosecutor has absconded with it, which is a felony. Alan has numerous causes of action.
Brain (MN) also revisits [at 1hr52m] his brief ROL conversation from August 26 concerning his speeding traffic stop that turned into a search and seizure of his vehicle. The police falsified evidence. Eddie throws out possibilities: criminal conspiracy, denial of due process, aggravated assault, and aggravated kidnapping. It is suggested that Brian file criminal complaints, that he file a motion withdrawing his “conciliation court” papers so that he can proceed into a formal court proceeding, and that he file criminal complaints with the grand jury.