• Category Archives 2012 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust
  • The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust » 2012 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust
  • 12-09-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Pediatrician Dr. Janet Levatin. Dr. Levatin is the pediatrician-in-residence at Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s Integrative Medical Center, in Ohio. She will relate the experiences that made her question vaccines – made her question her medical training – and what she’s discovered in her subsequent research.

    Patti Finn, vaccine attorney. Ms. Finn has put out an all points bulletin for nurses and other health care workers who are being fired, or threatened with termination, for refusing the flu shot. She’ll discuss her basic strategies and past experiences in battling such cases.

    The issue of trust was the most unusual. In the recent Congressional hearing on autism, it was made abundantly clear that several of the legislators posing questions to the CDC representatives were doing so because they’ve had an increasing number of their constituents sitting in their offices, frustrated and angry because they had no doubt that vaccines had seriously damaged their children, and very tired of the refusal on the part of the entities assigned the responsibility of oversight of the nation’s health to speak directly to the issue.

    We know there is a behemoth behind the vaccination paradigm. Those nurses threatened with termination are the collateral damage of requirements recently put in place by the Department of Health and Human Services, with which hospitals must comply to receive 2% of their Medicare monies. Those vaccinations – both flu and pneumonia for patients, and flu-only for employees – are listed as Prevention: Global Immunization Measures. The pressure on legislators to stifle any blossoming curiosity about a vaccine link to autism must be weighty, but if there’s anything that can counter it, it’s the threat from disgruntled constituents of loss of the next election.

    So our issue of trust is unusual, indeed: we trust that a continual stream of parents through the offices of legislators, relating their stories of vaccine damage and letting it be known in no uncertain terms that they expect the good Representative or Senator to not only breathe down the neck of the CDC, but actively work to make real progress happen, may have a meaningful impact.

    On the schedule for next week, and hopin’ she stays on it: Lisa Joyce Goes, autism mom, the Rev of the Thinking Mom’s Revolution, and an indomitable spirit. The messages that flow through her pen cannot be ignored.

    VAX_2012-12-09_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-12-09_16k.mp3


  • 12-02-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Today’s episode involves two issues of trust:

    OBGYN’s have begun recommending the Tdap vaccine to their patients, in addition to the flu shot they began recommending two years ago. Our guest just a few weeks ago, Eileen Dannemann, Director of the National Coalition of Organized Women, spoke to the huge increase, of over 4,000%, in miscarriages and stillbirths in 2009/2010, with the introduction of the H1N1 vaccine. In 2010 the H1N1 vaccine was added to the seasonal flu shot, and the CDC urged OBGYN’s to begin routinely administering it to all of their patients. The CDC was aware at the time of the tremendous increase in risk, percentage-wise, that had resulted from the previous year’s H1N1 vaccination campaign, yet told the OBGYN’s there had been no increase in risk. To now add the Tdap vaccine as a recommendation is insidious.

    This past Thursday, November 29, 2012, the Congressional Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a hearing on autism, spurred by the announcement months back that the incidence of autism in the U.S. in children has reached 1 in 88. Almost comical, were it not for the medical tragedy unfolding before our very eyes in the epidemics of neurological and autoimmune disorders in the nation’s youth, the two CDC officials sidestepped, vaulted and otherwise detoured around half the vaccine-related questions asked of them, Dr. Coleen Boyle, in particular, hemming and hawing in such absurd fashion as to be a virtual caricature of herself. Promises were made in many instances to provide to the Committee in the future, answers relevant to the questions being asked of them in the hearing; answers which they should have had at their fingertips, and which, beyond the televised hearing, will now be generally unavailable to the public. Add to this that when asked about the participation of wanted criminal Poul Thorsen, Danish research scientist who absconded with millions of CDC-sponsored dollars, in the studies the CDC has used to announce no proven link between vaccines and autism, she responded, he was involved in only two of the several. A short while later in the same hearing, however, the Congressman who had initially asked the question held up for all to see the papers he had just been handed by one of his staffers, listing Thorsen as a researcher in twenty of the twenty-two studies. Not a comment was made to Dr. Boyle about her previous response, which at that point lay somewhere between significantly incomplete information and perjury.

    The guests were:

    Deanna Gromowski, mother of Ian, who died at the hands of a Hep B vaccine. Ian never left the hospital setting. He had some relatively minor problems at birth that kept him hospitalized a few days extra. On day seven, as he was about to be released, he was given the Hep B vaccine, and within hours his fatal allergic reaction had begun. His parents had been given no warning about any potential side effects; no advisement that vaccinations should not be administered if there were existing immune system compromise, as was the case with Ian.

    Ian’s case worsened, and he was transferred to another hospital, where he continued to worsen, to pass away on his forty-seventh day. At the second hospital, a neonatologist told Deanna, off the record, that because of Ian’s reaction she should not vaccinate any future children. The doctor also helped Deanna write a report for submission to VAERS – the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – but would not sign it, leaving that for Deanna. VAERS reports are typically submitted by doctors. A telltale sign of the stranglehold the industry has on information, the doctor also wanted to write up Ian’s case history, but was told by the hospital administration that she would be fired if she did.

    Ian’s story:
    http://www.IansVoice.org

    Sallie O. Elkordy, journalist and researcher, and co-host of The Mary and Sallie Show, was our second guest. Vaccines are only one of the many issues Sallie researches – and in which she takes an active role. Sallie has written proposed legislation to ban all vaccines.

    Information central for Sallie’s work:
    http://billiontoddlermarchforsurvival.blogspot.com/

    The Mary and Sallie Show:
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow

    VAX_2012-12-02_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-12-02_16k.mp3


  • 11-25-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    The issue of trust was the lack of dissemination of the news of the alleviation of autism symptoms triggered by the treatment of the Lancet kids’ bowel diseases. The effect of the treatments was so momentous as to be a potentially substantial breakthrough in perspective on autism and development of recovery strategies. To varying degrees on an individual basis, the kids began sleeping through the night, after many months or years of not having done so; began not only speaking after not having spoken, but resumed the learning of vocabulary – most remarkable and heartening, in some cases using the newfound speech on a level commensurate with their growth since ceasing to speak, making it clear that they had continued growing internally, both emotionally and intellectually, despite displaying the symptoms of autism; and, poignantly, began once again recognizing and bonding emotionally with their families.

    This news should have been trumpeted in headlines around the world, yet, in the now many years since the publication of the case series, we’ve seen not even a mention.

    The guest was gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who, together with his twelve colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in London, a formidable team of doctors and clinicians, led by one of the world’s leading pediatric gastroenterologists, Professor Walker-Smith, examined, analyzed and treated twelve children, all of whom had autism and severe gastrointestinal problems. To this day, the parents of the twelve children stand in strong support of the treatment of their children, lauding, indeed, that for the first time in the history of their kids’ illnesses, they were treated with the respect and compassion we should expect in health care.

    Dr. Wakefield discussed the focus of his new book, Waging War on the Autistic Child: The Arizona 5 and the Legacy of Baron Von Munchausen, including the intriguing possibility that autism can be passed from one sibling to another through horizontal transmission, as opposed to contagion. That vaccine viruses can be horizontally transmitted has been adequately demonstrated, scientifically. The unusual fold here would be the harboring of the vaccine virus in the gut of the transmission recipient, which is perhaps explainable by the fact that horizontal transmission of measles can take place – indeed, because of the nature of such transmission is likely to take place – orally, whereas typical societal transmission of wild measles is respiratory in nature.

    Nancy and Dr. Wakefield discussed the role of antibiotics in the incidence of autism. Antibiotics, much in use, destroy not only those bacteria in the gut considered the disease pathogens, but all bacteria, the vast majority of which are beneficial and absolutely necessary for proper digestion, and therefore proper function of the immune system. The doctor described the finding in the guts of autistic children of a markedly different, atypical, population of bacteria, when compared with healthy individuals.

    Nancy asked the good doctor whether, considering that information such as we were discussing, readily available, is routinely not provided in mainstream media, thus unknown in the general public, there is any hope: yes, but only if parents wake up to the facts and take up political arms against legislation requiring vaccines, which constitute a usurpation of their parental rights and the suffocation of their freedom to fulfill their parental responsibility to protect their children. The good news is that in various studies upwards of 90% of parents surveyed said their main medical concern is vaccine safety.

    Incredibly, Dr. Wakefield also described the following parameters laid out by the CDC, for pre-clinical testing of the measles vaccine by manufacturers, to determine whether it’s safe to inject into children. A group of monkeys – no control group required – receives thalamic injections of pure measles antigen – directly into the thalamus, in the brain. They are then observed for 21 days, after which they are sacrificed and analyzed. If a monkey dies within 48 hours, however, it is considered uncooperative – an inferior recruit – and replaced with another monkey, one that will hopefully have more respect for the process. If more than 20% die, the entire test is considered aberrant, and a new one implemented. So goes the testing to determine whether the substance is safe to use in vaccine clinical trial – typically for injection into healthy three-to-nine year olds.

    Finally, he discussed the fact that a virus is a potentially infectious agent, but does not necessarily become pathogenic until other factors come into play. He referred specifically to the plague virus a particular group of Mongolian ground squirrels harbor in their throats, but from which they never develop the disease – as it turns out, after a study implemented by the Russian government, because their diet includes certain minerals that are found in the indigenous vegetation, whereas other colonies of the same species of squirrel, in other locations, succumb to the disease, lacking the good mineral, or ingesting other, toxic, minerals instead. This phenomenon speaks directly to a core tenet of the vaccination paradigm, which considers every infectious agent a pathogen, and every pathogen, a cause of disease. Obviously, it’s not really that simple.

    Dr. Wakefield also announced the creation of the Academic Integrity Fund, established to help support medical professionals who speak out about the dangers of vaccines, as well as other drugs, and the corruption revealed in the pharmaceutical industry’s attacks upon them.

    Dr. Wakefield’s books are available at:
    http://www.Callous-Disregard.com

    The Academic Integrity Fund:
    http://academicintegrityfund.com/

    VAX_2012-11-25_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-11-25_16k.mp3


  • 11-04-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    VAX_2012-11-04_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-11-04_16k.mp3

    The guest was nutritional pharmacist, Ben Fuchs. Mr. Fuchs explained that the body is a self-healing organism, as long as it is given the right tools, those tools being the nutrients that are essential to the proper function of the immune system. Since the symptoms of what we call disease are literally the working of the immune system in its elimination of toxicity or illness as it brings the body back to wellness, suppression of those symptoms is counterproductive to recovery, and that is exactly what allopathic medicine attempts to do – suppress the symptoms.

    In many cases, rather than being sick, we are, in a real sense, starving, even while the problem of obesity worsens; the fast food, processed food, packaged food diet denies us essential nutrients, and even a carefully constructed diet can be deficient, because of the depleted condition of the much of cropland soil. Not receiving the vitamins, minerals and enzymes it needs, the body simply continues to crave more food.

    The steps in natural treatment of disease are to regulate the diet, by eliminating any foods that disturb digestion and adding nutrient-rich items; eliminate stress, on every level – mental, emotional and physical – which also greatly affects the functionality of the immune system; and determine which nutritional supplements will most directly aid your immune system in eliminating the respective disease, depending on the type of illness and the specific organs or areas of the body affected.

    Ben Fuchs’ website:
    http://www.BrightsideBen.com

    The issue of trust was the lack of fulfillment of the basic medical ethic of informed consent in the administration of vaccines. Informed consent is the first tenet of the Nuremberg Code, and mandates that any and all negative consequences of an experimental medical procedure be communicated to the subject, or patient, and consent be obtained before administering the procedure. The responsibility for the quality of the consent “rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”

    Vaccines are experimental. When vaccine manufacturers apply for license of their products, they certify they are safe. Safe, however, in the vaccine industry, literally does not mean, does not harm. It means, the benefits outweigh the risks – but at the time of application for license, the true extent of the risks is not known. The National Institute of Health defines the final stage of clinical trial – Phase IV – as the collection of data after licensure, during the years of mass administration to the public, and with good reason: the subjects of trials conducted by the vaccine manufacturers are hand picked – that is, their health status is well known – so how vaccines will affect the general population is unknown; and more importantly, the manufacturers’ trials are relatively brief, comprising only a few weeks of close monitoring, yet it is well known that vaccine damage can occur weeks, months and even years after the fact of the vaccination.

    Thus, it is critical that full information be provided every potential vaccinee, but that mandate is never fulfilled. At best, a cursory document, called a VIS – Vaccine Information Sheet – is provided the patient, but that sheet is anything but fully informative. On a daily basis, hundreds, if not thousands, of children and adults alike are vaccinated, with little or no knowledge of the injury that may result.

    The NIH definition of clinical trial:
    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/ctphases.html


  • 10-28-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    VAX_2012-10-28_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-10-28_16k.mp3

    The guest was Christina England, journalist and vaccine researcher, whose many articles in TheAmericanChronicle.com and VacTruth.com speak to a myriad of vaccine issues, with a focus on false allegations of child abuse. Ms. England explained her route to journalism: after repeated attempts to find medical help for her two adopted special needs children, both of whom had been diagnosed as being on the autism sepctrum, and one of whom she’d discovered had suffered at the hands of an MMR vaccine, she was falsely accused of Munchausen’s by Proxy as a result. She was ultimately cleared of all the accusations, and that was the point at which the Special Service in the UK told her, as a threat, never to reveal to the media what she had learned during her contest with the authorities over the Muchasen’s by Proxy allegations; the false documents and other corrupt practices that had been used against her. So instead of going to the media, Ms. England became the media, completing a degree in journalism, and has been writing ever since, about the dangers of vaccines, and false allegations of child abuse, which cases she also helps defend.

    Access to Ms. England’s articles:
    http://vactruth.com/category/writers/c-england/
    http://www.americanchronicle.com/authors/view/3735

    Christina England is also the co-author, with Dr. Harold Buttram, of Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused?, available on Amazon.

    The issue of trust was the AAP vaccine refusal form, the wording of which lacks any true substance as an advisory, because it misinforms, with no mention of the sometimes catastrophic consequences of vaccinating, and no mention that vaccinated children can and do develop the very disease against which they’d been vaccinated, and can transmit the disease to others. Then, to bring the misrepresentation to its absurd, self-incriminating climax, this statement:

    I know that failure to follow the recommendations about vaccination may endanger the health or life of my child and others with which my child might come into contact.

    Obviously, no parent should ever sign this form as it is written. A few well-chosen word changes, deletions and additions will morph the message into the truth; initial the changes and have the doctor’s staff do likewise before signing. That is the point at which the pediatrician may notify you that since you choose to not vaccinate and will not incriminate yourself by signing the Refusal Form as written, he will no longer be able to treat your family. That is also the point at which pediatricians have made themselves not only useless, but dangerous. Opt for a general practitioner, if you must stay with allopathy. Many instead choose holistic health care – naturopathy, homeopathy, chiropractic – and learn to treat disease at home, discovering in the process that the fear of disease instilled in us by the vaccine industry is totally overblown and unwarranted.


  • 10-21-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Due to technical difficulties, some of the breaks and part of the third segment did not air. The archive has been edited to include only that which went out on the air.

    VAX_2012-10-21_64k_partial.mp3

    VAX_2012-10-21_16k_partial.mp3

    Dr. Viera Scheibner discussed the Cotwatch studies she and her late husband conducted, using a computerized breathing monitor developed by him. They discovered that infants experience chronic bouts of severely reduced air intake in the first 24 hours following vaccination, again a week later, and then again. Using government statistics, Dr. Scheibner found the same temporal pattern in the occurrence of many cases of SIDS.

    Donna Voetee, Granny Good-Food to her Facebook fans, discussed, as political foundation to the issue of trust that is food safety: the technically questionable validity of the convening of the U.S. Congress since the Civil War; the advent of the corporation, eliminating personal liability from corporate officers for any damage done by their company; and many examples of the government’s classification, or definition, of humans as animals, as indicative of the lack of ordinary human concern and compassion that should govern the regulation of food production, but does not.

    The issue of trust was the suppression of mainstream information regarding Dr. Scheibner’s Cotwatch studies, which implicate vaccinations as causative of SIDS.

    Dr. Scheibner’s websites:

    http://www.VieraScheibner.com
    http://www.VieraScheibner.net
    http://www.VieraScheibner.org

    Donna Voetee can be found on Facebook as Granny Good-Food:

    http://www.facebook.com/granny.goodfood?ref=ts&fref=ts


  • 10-14-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    hawn and Nancy begin a recap of the various issues of trust discussed on the show. They cover:

    The deception of the portrayal of the eradication of polio by the polio vaccine, reviewing the official changes made by the CDC, concurrently with the introduction of the vaccine, to the diagnostic parameters of paralytic polio, eliminating, but not eradicating, more than two-thirds of the cases that would thenceforth be diagnosed; and the less official change in protocol used in diagnosing non-paralytic poliomyelitis, in essence wiping that disease out of the medical dictionary. To sum: statistical parlour tricks, rather than disease eradication.

    The lack of fulfillment of their responsibility to announce to the American public the findings of the CDC’s own 1999 in-house Verstraeten study, which showed a direct link between the mercury in vaccines and the increasing incidence of learning and speech disorders and autism.

    The crossing of an ethical line every time a public health official or doctor chants the mantra, correlation doesn’t equal causation, to assuage parental fears over the several hundred thousand serious adverse vaccine-associated reactions that have been recorded in the CDC’s VAERS database. Without full knowledge of the individual cases, such statements are false, for they imply that there’s no need for concern, when, statistically speaking, the correlation that is the collection of VAERS reports, by definition, are not expected to be coincidental; they are expected to be causally related to the vaccines.

    Callers to the show spoke to vaccine damage, in which, yet again, an initial diagnosis of vaccine-induced brain damage as the cause of an infant death was changed to SIDS; to the current administration of multiple vaccines to kids in clinics being held in Wyoming public schools; and to a focus on nutrition in diet, and supplementation where needed, to sustain a robust immune system.

    The issue of trust was the bizarre path we have followed, that leads to such dire straits; where we are compelled to disseminate the truth that there are grave reasons to distrust the very authorities on whom we are told to rely for information about the threat, prevention and treatment of infectious disease.

    Resources:

    http://www.GreatMothersQuestioningVaccines.com

    https://www.facebook.com/GMAOQV?ref=ts&fref=ts

    VAX_2012-10-14_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-10-14_16k.mp3


  • 10-07-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Shawn and Nancy’s guest is Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, osteopath and board certified in emergency medicine, director of an integrative medical center incorporating various allopathic and holistic medical disciplines, and prodigious vaccine researcher and author of articles, seminars, books and DVD’s.

    The issue of trust was the discrepancy between the information contained in the reams of vaccine-related studies and articles, and the information the vaccine industry disseminates via the mainstream media. Dr. Tenpenny defined the problem more precisely, speaking to the disconnect between the body of information in many of those documents, versus the stated conclusions and findings, which are all that most doctors read. This is a disturbing reality, since that information then becomes part of the doctors line of reasoning in diagnosing and treating disease.

    The wide-ranging discussion spoke to:

    Dr. Tenpenny’s Vaccine Research Library, a compendium of thousands of conventional articles and studies, all refuting the mainstream portrayal of vaccines as safe, effective and necessary.

    The great benefits of natural contraction of disease in general, and measles in particular, which in previous years was viewed as a rite of passage of the immune system, solidifying its autonomous function. Vaccines thwart that process.

    The false belief that it is essential to have a pediatrician – that, minus a congenital anomaly or complicated pediatric illness, that holistic and personal care is, as it has been through the ages, sufficient; that, indeed, so-called pediatric wellness visits are thinly-veiled vaccination schedule compliance surveillance sessions.

    The routine use of highly reactive agents such as prior years’ vaccines as ostensible placebos in the testing of new vaccines, obviously greatly obfuscating the test results, since a placebo is, by definition, non-reactive.

    The lack of integrity of the CDC in not long ago implementing a comprehensive comparative study of the medical histories of the vaccinated, vs the completely unvaccinated, using the excuse that it would be unethical to refuse vaccination to some children to accomplish such a study, but knowing full well that there are over a million kids in the U.S. who are unvaccinated because of their parents’ choice – a more than adequate number to produce meaningful findings.

    References and resources:
    Dr. Tenpenny’s DVD, Vaccines: the Benefits, the Risks, the Choices – available, along with her books and other DVD’s, at:
    http://drtenpenny.com/
    The Facebook page, Dr Tenpenny on Vaccines
    http://vaccineresearchlibrary.com/

    VAX_2012-10-07_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-10-07_16k.mp3


  • 09-23-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Summary, September 23, 2012

    Leslie Carol Botha, Women’s Health Educator, publisher, author and broadcast journalist, discussed the natural, cyclical weakening of women’s immune systems, both pre- and post-menstrual, that are never discussed by public health entities or doctors in their push for the uptake of HPV vaccines, though they make the women more susceptible to vaccine damage. She also discussed the 42.6% increase in probability of pre-cancerous lesions, as shown in Merck’s own Gardasil trial results, in about 6% of adolescent women who receive the vaccine – a poignant statistic, yet never mentioned in the mainstream. She discussed as well the fact that the FDA Commissioner and CDC Director have ignored letters sent them by the Centers for the Biology of Chronic Disease, warning that, for the public safety, they pay heed to evidence that the recombinant HPV DNA fragments we now know reside in apparently all HPV vaccines can actually cause long-term, chronic illness.

    Leslie’s website: http://holyhormones.com/leslie-botha-bio/

    Lori Mitchell Lee discussed both her own adverse reaction to a yellow fever vaccine, and her child’s progressively worse reactions to a series of DPT shots. She then moved on to the current state of affairs in her state of West Virginia, where she is one of a large group of parents lobbying to establish a non-medical vaccine exemption. Only one other state – Mississippi – offers only a medical exemption, and in West Virginia, even when said exemption is duly authorized, public health authorities will, more often than not, not accept them.

    There is an additional concern: West Virginia state health regulatory agencies have in the last few years illegally mandated additional vaccines, using the existing interpretive rule with no authority to do so. Yet, the parents in the state are being held accountable for the additional vaccinations for their children.

    The West Virginia state of affairs is terrible. Non-vaccine compliant families are being threatened with removal of their kids from schools. Even homeschoolers are monitored for vaccine compliance in West Virginia, and West Virginia is the only state that attaches misdemeanor charges, including a $50 fine, to every missed vaccine. There are even threats of charges of child abuse.

    You can follow the parents’ progress, and support them, at:

    http://www.WeTheParents.info .

    The political landscape cannot be ignored. Attacks are mounting against existing exemptions, with the support of national immunization coalitions, backed by even larger groups. Stay abreast of vaccine-related legislation in your state by registering with the NVIC Vaccine Advocacy Portal, at:

    http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx

    The issue of trust was the lack of any meaningful discussion of the tremendous decline in disease mortality rates during the 20th century, prior to the introduction of the vaccines, making virtually all disease essentially non-life threatening, eliminating the most fundamental argument for vaccination; and the CDC’s continued mischaracterization of the decline of disease mortality following the introduction of the vaccines as caused by the vaccinations, rather than the obviously more accurate statement that they were simply the continued progress of an already existing, long-established decline.

    VAX_2012-09-23_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-09-23_16k.mp3


  • 09-16-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Dr. Lorraine Day (http://www.drday.com) discussed her battle with, and victory over, advanced cancer in 1993. She refused chemotherapy, radiation and mutilating surgery and chose to rebuild her immune system by totally natural therapies, so her body could heal itself. She discussed the role of virus and bacteria in disease as that of clean-up crew – to eliminate an already existing toxicity from the body. She stressed the synergy of the components of good health: exercise, good diet, and right attitude, which affords the ability to handle stress. She also briefly mentioned vaccination as a means of depopulation and eugenics, a topic that is surfacing more frequently on the show, because the evidence that that is indeed the case continues to mount, as the number of doctors and researchers who express the same opinion continues to increase.

    Donna Voetee (https://www.facebook.com/granny.goodfood?ref=ts), known on Facebook as Granny Good-Food, discussed her use of alternative medicine to help heal her son from aplastic anemia. She discussed the vitamins and minerals that were most essential to the maintenance of a healthy immune system, and described three essential food groups: Guts n’ grease – organ meat and products made from raw milk;
    Stinky stuff – fermented: sauerkraut, kefir, yogurt, kombucha, seaweed, etc.; and
    Squiggly stuff – organic, unflavored gelatin; bone stock.

    The issue of trust was the the usurpation of parental authority that are the laws establishing both vaccination requirements for public schools and mandate of compliance with vaccine exemption protocols to refuse vaccines, when what should be established are laws mandating provision on the part of doctors and vaccine implementers of all negative vaccine information, with strict penalties for non-compliance, and mandatory signature of consent. Vaccines can, and do, after all, permanently damage and kill children.

    VAX_2012-09-16_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-09-16_16k.mp3


  • 09-09-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Sunday, September 9, 2012 – As the issue of trust, Shawn and co-host Nancy discussed the problems surrounding the HPV vaccines: the serious misgivings about the decision to license the HPV vaccines, as expressed in a 2008 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, vis-a-vis the licensing of the vaccines in 2006, almost a year before relevant findings from “the first phase 3 trials of the HPV vaccine with clinically relevant end points” were even determined; the unethical non-disclosure to the public – suppression – of the findings in Merck’s own Gardasil studies, that in about 6% of the population – those girls who had not cleared previous HPV infections – a vaccine recipient’s chances of developing pre-cancerous cervical lesions, and therefore cervical cancer, actually increased; and the terrible record of damage already left in the wake of HPV vaccine administration, after only a half dozen years licensed: over 12,000 reported serious adverse reactions, including 891 permanent disabilities, 509 life threatening reactions, and 119 deaths.

    The guest, Meryl Dorey, founder in 1994 of the Australian Vaccination Network, discussed the unethical practice of mandate of vaccines that can literally damage and kill the recipient; the lack of fulfillment of the first tenet of the Nuremberg Code, free provision of all information about the potential dangers of vaccines; the lack of independent vaccine safety studies; the lack of comparative studies of the medical histories of the vaccinated, vs the unvaccinated; and many other aspects of vaccine awareness.

    Meryl also discussed the history of abuse, against the AVN site and against her personally, at the hands of a group determined to stop the free flow of vaccine information in Australia.

    VAX_2012-09-09_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-09-09_16k.mp3


  • 09-02-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Shawn reviewed the history of eugenics in the United States. Funded by the likes of the Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie Institute and the Kellogg’s of Battle Creek, Michigan, the eugenics movement was alive and well during most of the first half of the 20th century, replete with all the trappings, including the fundamental notion that Germanic and Nordic races were superior, and espousal of euthanasia of the inferior including the use of gas chambers.

    Most sobering is the superficial divorce form Nazi-style eugenics, post-WWII, purely as a face-saving strategy. As supported by history, the eugenics movement in the U.S. then took on the guise of Social Engineering, the Science of Man and other less threatening labels. Among the more than 750 Nazi scientists brought to the United States after WWII in Operation Paperclip, of whom many had participated in the horrendous medical experiments on concentration camp prisoners, one has to wonder how many were dispersed to government programs involved in the development of vaccines.

    The issue of trust was the suppression of information that should be well publicized information cataloged by Hilary Butler in her paper, Vaccines and Neonatal Immune Development: the natural lack of production during the first twenty-four months of a baby’s development of certain immune proteins that trigger an inflammatory response, to afford the immune system ample time to identify and recognize both the self and environmental biologics such as potential allergens, to preclude autoimmunity once the inflammatory response kicks in. An assault on that natural, most gracious process, the adjuvants in vaccines excite the immune system, triggering an inflammatory response. The current epidemics of previously unheard of autoimmune diseases in juveniles, such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma and diabetes, thus should not be a mystery, but, rather, an expected result of the injection of one hundred fifteen doses of disease antigens by the age of two, including close to thirty adjuvants.

    Ginger Landry Lee called in to complete the story of her son’s vaccine damage, including a description of repeated post-vaccination bouts of back arching and high-pitched screaming, indicating brain inflammation and possible brain damage, but repeatedly discounted by her boy’s doctors as normal.

    VAX_2012-09-02_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-09-02_16k.mp3


  • 08-26-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    Sunday, August 26, 2012. A very special broadcast of The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust. Eleven parents of vaccine damaged children, in a few cases adults who themselves were injured, called in to give a brief encapsulation of the experience. They shared with us their journeys, the tip of the iceberg that is the true extent of vaccine damage; the true insidious, virtually deceptive nature of many of the injuries left in the wake of vaccination; and the sometimes arrogant, sometimes simply naïve, sometimes defiant denial on the part of doctors, in their reluctance or outright refusal to acknowledge vaccine damage as a reality, or a possibility in their patient.

    VAX_2012-08-26_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-08-26_16k.mp3


  • 08-19-12 The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust

    The guest for the first hour was vaccine attorney Alan Phillips. Alan talked about the ins and outs of vaccine exemptions; how they apply to daycare and public schools, vs nursing school vaccination requirements, vs hospital and health care industry requirements. Alan also discussed the NVIC Vaccine Advocacy Portal, a resource for staying abreast of vaccine-related legislation in your state.

    The guest the second hour was Michael Belkin, who spoke to the loss of his infant daughter to a Hep B shot, and the outrageous treatment to which he was subsequently subjected by the vaccine industry. A musician, Michael’s grief found outlet through soulful songs, via his band, The Refusers. The music of The Refusers opens each hour of the show, and is not to be denied.

    The issue of trust was Correlation Implies Causation. The mantra, “correlation doesn’t equal causation,” used by public health officials and doctors to assuage parental concerns raised by the hundreds of thousands of serious reactions reported associated with vaccines, is a smoke screen, unworthy of those who state it. Vaccines can damage, and vaccines can kill. To then attempt to motivate people to vaccinate by implying they can simply discount reported injuries, with no proof, on an individual case basis, that the reactions are not causally related to the vaccines, crosses an ethical line. It is a coercive use of the bully pulpit enjoyed by medical professionals.

    VAX_2012-08-19_64k.mp3

    VAX_2012-08-19_16k.mp3